Proposition 54K3079

Projet de loi relatif à la transposition de la directive 2014/50/UE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 16 avril 2014 relative aux prescriptions minimales visant à accroître la mobilité des travailleurs entre les Etats membres en améliorant l'acquisition et la préservation des droits à pension complémentaire.

General information ¶

Submitted by

MR Swedish coalition

Submission date

May 8, 2018

Official page

Visit

Status

Adopted

Requirement

Simple

Subjects

EC Directive supplementary pension job mobility pension scheme free movement of workers

Voting ¶

Voted to adopt

Groen CD&V Vooruit Ecolo LE PS | SP DéFI ∉ Open Vld N-VA MR PP

Abstained from voting

PVDA | PTB VB

Contact form ¶

Do you have a question or request regarding this proposition? Select the most appropriate option for your request and I will get back to you shortly.

Discussion ¶

June 21, 2018 | Plenary session (Chamber of representatives)

Full source

I refer to the written report.

Mr. Speaker, I will intervene promptly since the Minister of Pensions is present so that he will not come for nothing.

If I had filed this bill for some time, it is because it is a priority to have a strong first legal pillar in terms of pensions but also because, on the other hand, it is important, by supplementing it with a second pillar, to attach the beginning of this second pillar to the first by linking it with the whole professional career to lower the minimum age of affiliation to a complementary pension plan from 25 to 18 years.

This allows workers to establish additional pension rights from the beginning of their professional career to supplement this statutory pension, which is even more important because the level of pensions in Belgium remains relatively low compared to all the countries around us.

If I intervene today, it is because I feel sorry that the government has not transposed this EU directive earlier. In fact, it provides, in the present case, for an entry into force on 21 May 2018. We are almost at the end of June! The State Council had already ticked on the original draft law, but you still postponed it through an amendment which, he, has not been submitted to the State Council. With the entry into force in 2019, we can ask whether it correctly complies with the European Directive which, I recall, provided for an entry into force on 21 May 2018.

For the rest, we will support this arrangement that we are in favour of. By its content, it joins the bill proposal that will then be transposed through this government bill.

Mr. Speaker, I would like to emphasize once again the progress that constitutes the vote on this adaptation of our legislation to the European Directive. This is evidently placed in the objective of further generalizing complementary pensions, thus allowing any worker who enters the position to be able to benefit from a second pillar without having to wait to the age of 25 or without having to renounce his second pillar if he changes an employer very quickly.

At the same time, it was intended to take into account the administrative difficulty that this may pose for a number of undertakings, by giving them time to adapt to the implementation of that directive. It is important that each company can adapt the second pillar procedures to the constraints of the new directive.

I also regret that in the Social Affairs Committee – this is not the fact of the government – there have been some tergiversations in the course of the analysis of this bill. Today, everything has come in order and I think that this significant advance in the second pillar can be made.

Mr. Speaker, just for the reality of the facts, I would like to reiterate that this directive dates from 16 April 2014, for an entry into force which, on the basis of the directive, was normally scheduled in February 2018. However, it must be said here that the government has had a large opportunity to do things well on time.

The [...]

On April 16, 2014, we were already in a special period. At some point, you have to be honest. You have been a minister for a while. I think you have not forgotten.

But we are in favor of the content of this text. I repeat that it is a pity that the government did not come in time, in compliance with the transposition of the directive. In essence, we will support this project, since we had ourselves filed in due time a bill transposing the directive to the advantage of the workers concerned.