Proposition 53K1618

Logo (Chamber of representatives)

Projet de loi modifiant la loi du 11 janvier 1993 relative à la prévention de l'utilisation du système financier aux fins du blanchiment de capitaux et du financement du terrorisme.

General information

Authors
CD&V Hendrik Bogaert, Servais Verherstraeten
LE Christophe Bastin
MR Philippe Goffin
Open Vld Gwendolyn Rutten
PS | SP Guy Coëme
Submission date
June 22, 2011
Official page
Visit
Status
Adopted
Requirement
Simple
Subjects
EC Directive administrative check post office financial services fraud organised crime postal service criminal law terrorism money laundering

Voting

Voted to adopt
Groen CD&V Vooruit Ecolo LE PS | SP Open Vld LDD MR VB
Abstained from voting
N-VA

Party dissidents

Contact form

Do you have a question or request regarding this proposition? Select the most appropriate option for your request and I will get back to you shortly.








Bot check: Enter the name of any Belgian province in one of the three Belgian languages:

Discussion

July 19, 2011 | Plenary session (Chamber of representatives)

Full source


President André Flahaut

The rapporteur, Mr. Goffin, being not present, I refer to his written report.


Veerle Wouters

Mr. Speaker, colleagues, bpost is competent for some financial postal services, namely: the domestic postal exchange, the circular postal cheque, the 679 accounts, the postal assignments and the deposit on account of third parties. For these financial postal services, bpost is subject to the preventive money laundering legislation.

The supervisory authority of bpost is the Minister of Public Companies. This Minister must therefore establish effective mechanisms to monitor compliance with the preventive money laundering legislation. The N-VA, like the proposers of the bill, understands that the minister can hardly take this task personally. The applicants propose to transfer this task to the FOD Finance.

However, as a result of the change in the supervision of the financial sector, the National Bank of Belgium is now charged with the individual prudential supervision of the financial institutions. It is therefore the National Bank of Belgium that establishes effective mechanisms in relation to those financial institutions to monitor compliance with the preventive money laundering legislation. In our view, it is logical that the National Bank of Belgium would apply the same control mechanisms for bpost’s financial services.

However, the fact that this bill is intended to entrust this task to the FOD Finance allows other control mechanisms to apply to the financial postal services. There is no objective reason for this. Therefore, our group will abstain in the vote on this bill.