Proposition 54K3107

Logo (Chamber of representatives)

Projet de loi portant modification de la loi du 11 décembre 1998 portant création d'un organe de recours en matière d'habilitations, d'attestations et d'avis de sécurité.

General information

Submitted by
MR Swedish coalition
Submission date
May 17, 2018
Official page
Visit
Status
Adopted
Requirement
Simple
Subjects
administrative procedure secret service public safety appeal

Voting

Voted to adopt
Groen CD&V Ecolo LE Open Vld N-VA MR VB
Abstained from voting
Vooruit PS | SP DéFI PVDA | PTB PP

Party dissidents

Contact form

Do you have a question or request regarding this proposition? Select the most appropriate option for your request and I will get back to you shortly.








Bot check: Enter the name of any Belgian province in one of the three Belgian languages:

Discussion

July 18, 2018 | Plenary session (Chamber of representatives)

Full source


President Siegfried Bracke

The rapporteurs, Mr Thiébaut and Mrs de Coster-Bachau, refer to their written report.

Mr Frédéric, you have the word.


André Frédéric PS | SP

I will be very brief, as I have been in the committee. As for what Minister Reynders proposes in his draft, we have no major concerns. I said it. The Minister in committee, we must know how to recognize it, gave reassuring answers to the points that we seemed to have to be the subject of a short-term evaluation. In particular, I think of the deadlines.

However, one point remains a difficulty and has led us to abstain on this text. The appeal body which constitutes a judicial body shall be composed of magistrates. This is a guarantee that seems obvious to us given the sensitive nature of the files handled within it and given the consequences related to these decisions. In the current state of affairs, it seems that the majority does not attach the same importance as it has so far.

I do not understand very well, Mr. Speaker, the reasons that lead the majority to deviate from what has long been perceived as the rule in this matter. That is why my group re-deposited the two amendments ensuring a composition in phase with the importance of the files handled and giving the presidency to the Chairman of the Committee R. We will see what will be the vote of the majority on these two amendments that we find quite justified and reasonable.