Projet de loi modifiant la loi du 26 janvier 2006 relative à la détention des stocks obligatoires de pétrole et des produits pétroliers et à la création d'une agence pour la gestion d'une partie de ces stocks et modifiant la loi du 10 juin 1997 relative au régime général, à la détention, à la circulation et aux contrôles des produits soumis à accises.
General information ¶
- Submitted by
- PS | SP MR Open Vld Vooruit Purple Ⅰ
- Submission date
- March 7, 2007
- Official page
- Visit
- Status
- Adopted
- Requirement
- Simple
- Subjects
- petroleum petroleum policy petroleum product seizure of goods buffer stock energy policy reserves stock
Voting ¶
- Voted to adopt
- CD&V Vooruit Ecolo LE PS | SP Open Vld N-VA MR VB
Contact form ¶
Do you have a question or request regarding this proposition? Select the most appropriate option for your request and I will get back to you shortly.
Discussion ¶
April 12, 2007 | Plenary session (Chamber of representatives)
Full source
Rapporteur Pierre Lano ⚙
I refer to my written report.
President Herman De Croo ⚙
Mr Wathelet, you have the word.
Melchior Wathelet LE ⚙
Mr. Speaker, I would like to draw attention to the fact that every time this text was amended, we highlighted the many inconsistencies that were found there and how it was adopted, namely in the urgency and at the last minute.
Let me make a small inventory.
This text was voted, for the first time, in our assembly, on 26 January 2006. It had to be amended, on 20 July 2006, if it had not been correctly drawn up. The changes made on this occasion were so good that it had to be changed again, on 27 December 2006. And today we must again review and adopt a text to which amendments have been made.
Within 15 months, this text was therefore modified four times because each time it was in the wrong time and in a hurried way.
It was said recently that Parliament cannot question the texts it voted a few months earlier. We find ourselves, however, before a typical example of texts which, having been examined and voted in the precipitation, must be continuously modified. This is not the best signal that the Parliament can give in this matter.
Paul Tant CD&V ⚙
Mr. Speaker, without seeking the presence of the Minister, it would be appropriate, fair and fair if he wanted to experience here the fourth amendment in a year time of his draft. That is a hideous fact. One must be able to come to Parliament on the same issue up to four times in a year. Congratulations to! This is a good example of how the law is made in this country. The colleague is right if he says this is largely due to the hurry with which the work is being done. I must be allowed to say that this is also often the result of a poor preparation of the texts.
President Herman De Croo ⚙
That this was unanimously approved in the committee, you knew of course.