Projet de loi modifiant l'article 42 de la loi du 23 mars 1989 relative à l'élection du Parlement européen.
General information ¶
- Submitted by
-
The Senate
- Submission date
- Nov. 17, 2000
- Official page
- Visit
- Status
- Rejected
- Requirement
- Simple
- Subjects
- European election multiple office holding organisation of elections election
Voting ¶
- Voted to adopt
- MR
- Voted to reject
- Groen CD&V Vooruit Ecolo LE Open Vld N-VA FN VB
Party dissidents ¶
- Jean-Pierre Detremmerie (LE) voted to adopt.
- Richard Fournaux (MR) voted to reject.
- Willy Cortois (Open Vld) abstained from voting.
- Herman De Croo (Open Vld) abstained from voting.
- Tony Smets (Open Vld) abstained from voting.
Contact form ¶
Do you have a question or request regarding this proposition? Select the most appropriate option for your request and I will get back to you shortly.
⚠️ Possible data error ⚠️
This proposition could possibly include unrelated discussions due to a heuristic extraction bug in propositions prior to 2007. As soon as I've got time to fix it, these will be removed when they're not supposed to be here.
Discussion ¶
Dec. 21, 2000 | Plenary session (Chamber of representatives)
Full source
Rapporteur Karine Lalieux ⚙
I am referring to my written report.
Jo Vandeurzen CD&V ⚙
Mr. Speaker, I will be brief. This communication can also be considered as accountability for my voting behavior later. Colleagues, this is another vote that we will have to hold all the way to modulate the entry into force of a number of laws that are important for the functioning of the judiciary. This law is the result of important discussions in the Dutroux committee and other parliamentary investigation committees. We had to repeat again and again that, in the absence of good disciplinary law, every debate about the functioning of the court and about the quality of justice did not get any grip on the reality.
During the previous legislature, we have all passed a new disciplinary law with great enthusiasm, precisely to implement all the recommendations of all those investigative committees. Once again, the entry into force of such a recommendation should be postponed. We had one and a half years to prepare for this. However, it should not have been. It would be interesting if we could show the media and the public opinion how it has been improvised here in the Justice Committee and in the plenary session in recent weeks to correct the proposals. Our group will not support this proposal with great conviction.
President Herman De Croo ⚙
General discussion is closed. The general discussion is closed.