Proposition 50K1003

Logo (Chamber of representatives)

Projet de loi modifiant l'article 42 de la loi du 23 mars 1989 relative à l'élection du Parlement européen.

General information

Submitted by
The Senate
Submission date
Nov. 17, 2000
Official page
Visit
Status
Rejected
Requirement
Simple
Subjects
European election multiple office holding organisation of elections election

Voting

Voted to adopt
MR
Voted to reject
Groen CD&V Vooruit Ecolo LE Open Vld N-VA FN VB

Party dissidents

Contact form

Do you have a question or request regarding this proposition? Select the most appropriate option for your request and I will get back to you shortly.








Bot check: Enter the name of any Belgian province in one of the three Belgian languages:

⚠️ Possible data error ⚠️

This proposition could possibly include unrelated discussions due to a heuristic extraction bug in propositions prior to 2007. As soon as I've got time to fix it, these will be removed when they're not supposed to be here.

Discussion

Dec. 21, 2000 | Plenary session (Chamber of representatives)

Full source


Rapporteur Karine Lalieux

I am referring to my written report.


Jo Vandeurzen CD&V

Mr. Speaker, I will be brief. This communication can also be considered as accountability for my voting behavior later. Colleagues, this is another vote that we will have to hold all the way to modulate the entry into force of a number of laws that are important for the functioning of the judiciary. This law is the result of important discussions in the Dutroux committee and other parliamentary investigation committees. We had to repeat again and again that, in the absence of good disciplinary law, every debate about the functioning of the court and about the quality of justice did not get any grip on the reality.

During the previous legislature, we have all passed a new disciplinary law with great enthusiasm, precisely to implement all the recommendations of all those investigative committees. Once again, the entry into force of such a recommendation should be postponed. We had one and a half years to prepare for this. However, it should not have been. It would be interesting if we could show the media and the public opinion how it has been improvised here in the Justice Committee and in the plenary session in recent weeks to correct the proposals. Our group will not support this proposal with great conviction.


President Herman De Croo

General discussion is closed. The general discussion is closed.