Projet de loi spéciale insérant un article 60bis dans la loi spéciale du 6 janvier 1989 sur la Cour d'arbitrage.
General information ¶
- Submitted by
-
The Senate
- Submission date
- Jan. 15, 2001
- Official page
- Visit
- Status
- Adopted
- Requirement
- Qualified
- Subjects
- higher court
Voting ¶
- Voted to adopt
- Groen CD&V Vooruit Ecolo LE PS | SP Open Vld N-VA MR FN VB
Contact form ¶
Do you have a question or request regarding this proposition? Select the most appropriate option for your request and I will get back to you shortly.
⚠️ Possible data error ⚠️
This proposition could possibly include unrelated discussions due to a heuristic extraction bug in propositions prior to 2007. As soon as I've got time to fix it, these will be removed when they're not supposed to be here.
Discussion ¶
March 15, 2001 | Plenary session (Chamber of representatives)
Full source
Rapporteur Danny Pieters ⚙
Mr. Speaker, we are currently dealing with a bill amending a special law and a bill amending a law, both concerning the judges of the Arbitration Court. The draft laws aim to enable the judges of the Arbitration Court to complete their files up to six months after reaching the retirement age and to grant them their normal bet during that period.
Commissioners pointed out the parallelism with arrangements for other magistrates.
In addition, an analogous arrangement for referendums was envisaged in another bill.
Furthermore, I would like to point out that the text was amended to clarify that the law enters into force from 1 March 2001, which took into account an opinion of the State Council. The Deputy Prime Minister agreed to such a provision, emphasizing that the Government always follows the opinions of the State Council in terms of details.
Both bills were unanimously approved.