54K2142 | Demobel

Projet de loi portant modification de l'arrêté royal du 24 septembre 2012 portant exécution de l'article 123 de la loi du 28 décembre 2011 portant des dispositions diverses.

General information ¶

Submitted by: MR Swedish coalition
Submission date: Nov. 8, 2016
Official page: Visit
Status: Adopted
Requirement: Simple
Subjects: reduction of working time part-time employment pension scheme

Voting ¶

Voted to adopt: CD&V Open Vld N-VA LDD MR PP
Voted to reject: Vooruit PS | SP DéFI PVDA | PTB
Abstained from voting: Groen Ecolo LE ∉ VB

Party dissidents ¶

Olivier Maingain (MR) voted to reject.

Contact form ¶

Do you have a question or request regarding this proposition? Select the most appropriate option for your request and I will get back to you shortly.

I'd like you to validate the translations on this page.
I'd like you to add the missing translations on this page.
There is an error in the information on this page.
I have another question or remark that's not listed here.

Your e-mail address
Bot check: Enter the name of any Belgian province in one of the three Belgian languages:
Province

Discussion ¶

Dec. 1, 2016 | Plenary session (Chamber of representatives)

Full source

President Siegfried Bracke ⚙

The rapporteur is Mrs Thoron. It refers to the written report.

Frédéric Daerden PS | SP ⚙

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Speaker.

Mr. Minister, you presented this bill as a mere technical adaptation aimed at taking into account the changes made by the government in terms of credit-time. However, it should be remembered that the changes induced by this order reduce the possibilities for the worker to lift up his foot and organize his career. I think here in particular of the abolition, in some cases, of the ONEM allowance and the assimilation to pensions.

We consider this project that endorses this amendment by decree to be unfair, because it penalizes workers at the level of their end-of-career arrangements that is, for us, of primary importance. Indeed, these arrangements allow workers to continue their careers in good conditions by raising their feet. And I’m not talking here about other measures you could take by royal decree and that could have other consequences on the attractiveness of time credit.

In this context, we will vote against this project.