53K2685 | Demobel

Projet de loi contenant le règlement définitif des budgets d'organismes d'intérêt public pour l'année 2007.

General information ¶

Submitted by: PS | SP the Di Rupo government
Submission date: March 4, 2013
Official page: Visit
Status: Adopted
Requirement: Simple
Subjects: budget institution of public utility national budget

Voting ¶

Voted to adopt: CD&V Vooruit LE PS | SP Open Vld MR
Abstained from voting: Groen Ecolo ∉ N-VA VB

Party dissidents ¶

Bernard Clerfayt (MR) abstained from voting.
Peter Luykx (CD&V) abstained from voting.
Damien Thiéry (MR) abstained from voting.

Contact form ¶

Do you have a question or request regarding this proposition? Select the most appropriate option for your request and I will get back to you shortly.

I'd like you to validate the translations on this page.
I'd like you to add the missing translations on this page.
There is an error in the information on this page.
I have another question or remark that's not listed here.

Your e-mail address
Bot check: Enter the name of any Belgian province in one of the three Belgian languages:
Province

Discussion ¶

May 8, 2013 | Plenary session (Chamber of representatives)

Full source

President André Flahaut ⚙

Mr Vandeput is the rapporteur, but he is apologized. Therefore, he refers to his written report.

Veerle Wouters ∉ ⚙

I see that the Secretary of State should serve us.

Mr. Speaker, colleagues, it is incomprehensible that at this time we have to approve accounts dated from 2003 to 2008, while now, legally, we should review and possibly approve accounts for 2011.

We also have a lot of questions regarding these accounts. It is absolutely unclear what will happen to the surpluses that some public utility institutions prove to have at the end of the year. On the other hand, there are also institutions that have credit surpluses for which the custodian has not given permission. One example is Fedasil. These are accounts that are not entirely legal.

Given the backwardness, we ask the Secretary of State to provide us with a schedule as soon as possible to remove that backwardness as soon as possible, so that we can finally discuss the accounts that we should discuss. This is also the reason why our group will abstain in the vote.

Staatssecretaris Hendrik Bogaert ⚙

Mr Wouters, you are absolutely right. I have already given a similar response in the committee. If the people at the top of the administration call themselves top managers, then they must ensure that the accounts are in time. I will therefore insist that this happens. If this does not happen systematically, I hope that this will be taken into account in the evaluations of top managers. I think these shortcomings can weigh on the evaluation.