Projet de loi modifiant l'article 220 de la loi du 4 décembre 1990 relative aux opérations financières et aux marchés financiers et les articles 121, § 1er, 1°, et 122 de la loi du 2 août 2002 relative à la surveillance du secteur financier et aux services financiers.
General information ¶
- Submitted by
- PS | SP MR Open Vld Vooruit Purple Ⅰ
- Submission date
- March 15, 2006
- Official page
- Visit
- Status
- Adopted
- Requirement
- Simple
- Subjects
- EC Directive share administrative check investment company stock-exchange transaction venture capital securities stock exchange financial policy financial occupation financial instrument financial institution financial transaction financial market investment transaction credit institution bond takeover bid issue of securities insurance
⚠️ Voting data error ⚠️
This proposition is missing vote information, which is caused by a bug in the heuristic algorithms. As soon as I've got time to fix it, the votes will be added to Demobel's database.
Contact form ¶
Do you have a question or request regarding this proposition? Select the most appropriate option for your request and I will get back to you shortly.
⚠️ Possible data error ⚠️
This proposition could possibly include unrelated discussions due to a heuristic extraction bug in propositions prior to 2007. As soon as I've got time to fix it, these will be removed when they're not supposed to be here.
Discussion ¶
May 4, 2006 | Plenary session (Chamber of representatives)
Full source
Rapporteur Luk Van Biesen ⚙
This was referred back to the Finance Committee last week. This was decided on 27 April in the plenary session of the House of Representatives. Didier Reynders, Vice-Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, said during the discussion, at the request of Mrs Annemie Roppe, that the amendments submitted by the Government — since there were a total of 7 new amendments added after it was sent to the plenary meeting — which resulted from the consultation with the financial sector aimed to clarify whether, when an institutional or private CCI is admitted or is being admitted to a regulated or organized public market, this automatically results in that CCI being no longer institutional or private.
The answer to that question was negative. Since the institutional or private character of an ICB is determined by the institutional or private character of its investors, the fact that the ICB is listed on a market cannot change that.
Ultimately, the various amendments were accepted telkenmale with 10 votes for and 3 abstentions.
I would like to add this oral report to my written report that I have already submitted.